beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A shall not exceed 67,765,357 Won and its 67,129, within the scope of the property inherited from the net F.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Defendant C, and D were convicted of the facts constituting the crime described in paragraphs (1) through (4) below, which became final and conclusive.
(1) Defendant D, in turn, conspiredd to receive the employee deposit funds with the loans of the Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2013Ma3764, etc.). (1) Defendant C, C, and E, a lessor, a false lessee, and Defendant B, as a false lessor, to have divided the loans of the employee deposit funds.
(2) According to the above public offering, Defendant D, C, etc. recruited Defendant B, a lessor who borrowed only the name on April 2012, and Defendant D, as if the loan applicant entered “G”, prepared relevant documents, such as a false certificate of employment, etc., and prepared a false lease contract for “Seoul Jongno-si H building 301” owned by Defendant B, a lessor, and transferred the same to F.
(3) After that, around April 2012, F applied for a loan of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the employee in charge of the loan of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the
However, in fact, the above lease contract was made by falsity, and F did not intend to use the loan as the deposit.
(4) Accordingly, the Defendants, in collusion with F and F, Brers et al., enticed the victim, thereby deceiving the victim. Around May 4, 2012, the Defendants acquired 70 million won from the victim to the Defendant B’s account, which is a false lessor, under the name of a deposit money for workers’ entire housing.
B. On May 4, 2012, the Plaintiff’s Financial Credit Guarantee Agreement concluded with the National Bank to apply for a loan of the said loan from the National Bank, the guarantee period is KRW 63,00,000, and the guaranteed principal is set at KRW 63,00.