logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.09.15 2015고단145 (2)
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, along with Bracker C and false Lessee D, borrowed the National Housing Fund as the source, received the employee deposit money to entrust a commercial bank with a loan business, and conspired in order to have it divided.

Accordingly, in order to pretend that D is an employee E with the intent of acquiring a loan after allowing D, an applicant for a loan, to obtain a loan for a pre-paid housing loan on August 2014, 2014, Bromoer C issued false employment certificates necessary for applying for a pre-paid housing loan, income tax withholding receipt, payment statement, etc. to D in order to disguise D as if D is an employee.

around August 2014, Brazil proposed that the Defendant, a lessor, who will prepare a false lease contract through D, play a false lessor's role as a payment for a certain portion of the loan, and upon accepting it, the Defendant prepared a false lease contract with respect to F apartment 503 204, Seo-gu Incheon, Incheon, which was owned by the Defendant, as if the Defendant and D actually entered into a lease contract, and transferred it to D.

D In August 2014, 2014, at the point of the Seo-gu Incheon Seo-dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, for the loan of the National Housing Fund of KRW 100 million to the employee in charge of the loan, the applicant actually worked in E and actually worked in E, and the loan was actually used as the deposit for the lease of the above apartment, and submitted a false lease contract and documents related to employment.

However, the defendant did not work as an employee E, and there was no intention to lease the above apartment house as a whole or to use the loan as a deposit for the lease of the above apartment as stated in the lease contract.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim in collusion with D, etc., and is the name of the employee deposit money around August 29, 2014.

arrow