logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.02.02 2015노2160
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal by the defendant;

A. The Defendant, who is misunderstanding of facts, has taken a body that could cause sexual humiliation or sense of shame, as it appears in the victim E, and there was only a fact that he taken the back habits of the victim E, but has not been taken by emphasizing the parts of the body of the victim. Therefore, the Defendant taken the body that may cause sexual humiliation or sense of shame

subsection (b) of this section.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged on the grounds of the statement of the victim without credibility, etc., thereby misleading the facts and adversely affecting the judgment.

B. In light of the fact that the criminal defendant was not subject to criminal punishment for the same crime and is in an economically difficult situation, the sentence of the court below which sentenced the order to complete a sexual assault treatment program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program program

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court regarding the assertion of misunderstanding of facts, the lower court may recognize the Defendant’s photographed the victim’s lower half-yearly body as stated in the facts charged.

Therefore, the court below's finding the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is just and there is no error as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

(1) The victim has consistently and specifically stated the police from the court of the original instance to the court of the original instance, and is consistent with the F’s statement and important point of view, which confirms the photograph of the defendant on the spot.

② The victim stated in the police that “the victim was a total of two pages, which was taken up at the lower part of the body, and was taken up at the lower part of the body” (Evidence No. 17th page). The victim was placed at the court of the lower court to the extent that he was found to have her her straw in the front part of the body, but her her straw in the front part of the body.”

At the time, kneee-knee-knee-knee-knee-knee

“.............” a photo taken.

arrow