1. The plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's successor's claim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except when adding or adding to the following is stated, and thus, the same is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

o Under the third third third chapter, “The Plaintiff sold the instant real estate to the Plaintiff’s succeeding Intervenor on November 26, 2019, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Plaintiff’s succeeding Intervenor on November 29, 2019.”

o 4th 6th 6th, the part of the 7th 7th , “The claims of this case, alleged by the plaintiff, is the status of a lessor on the ground that the lease contract based on the instant lease agreement was concluded between the defendant and the defendant,” stipulated that “the plaintiff, under the premise that the lease contract was concluded between the plaintiff and the defendant with the same content as the instant lease agreement, the plaintiff's succeeding intervenor sought implementation following the termination of the lease agreement against each defendant on the premise that he was succeeded to the status of the lessor from the plaintiff.”

o 4th 13th 13th , “The claim of the plaintiff in this case shall be filed with “the claim of the plaintiff and the plaintiff succeeding intervenor all”.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it does not exist, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just to conclude this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal shall be dismissed.

The plaintiff succeeding intervenor's claim made in this court is dismissed as it is without merit.