1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Basic facts

A. The land research division drafted during the Japanese occupation point period is indicated in the land research division as follows: (a) Dong, the Defendant B’s shipbuilding group, entered the 954 square meters (hereinafter “the mother land of this case”) prior to Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do; (b)

B. On June 15, 1956, the mother land of this case was divided into 336 (the land of this case was changed after the change of the name of the administrative district; hereinafter in this case, the land before the change of the name of the above administrative district was also referred to as the "land of this case"), 286, 284, and 48 square meters in Qua river (hereinafter referred to as the "facilities number for convenience") and the former land cadastre (Evidence No. 11-1-4) as to each of the above land was written by the J where the first owner is located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City I.

C. The application for compensation (Evidence 8-2, No. 4) drafted on May 6, 1952 with respect to the mother land, etc. of this case is written by the applicant’s address and name as “Seoul Jongno-gu R L”, the address and name of the registrant of the registry as “Seoul Jongno-gu SJ”, and the compensation register (Evidence A-5) written at the time is written by the registration number as T, the name and address of the victim’s name and address as “L, Jongno-gu Seoul R,” respectively. Of each land divided from the mother land of this case, the O and the distribution farmland register as to P are written by “Seoul J”.

The registration of preservation of ownership in the name of the Republic of Korea was completed as of January 8, 1996 by the Suwon District Court, the Suwon District Court, Jeonyang-dong Branch, and the 186 Office received on January 8, 1996. However, Defendant B filed a lawsuit against the Republic of Korea for cancellation of registration of preservation of ownership, etc. against the Republic of Korea by asserting that the land of this case was the land under the circumstances of Eul, one’s own shipbuilding, and the above court rendered a favorable judgment in full favor of Defendant B on June 23, 2011, and became final and conclusive around that time.

E. Accordingly, as to the instant land, Defendant B, July 19, 201.