beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. According to the Land Survey Division prepared under the Decree on Land Survey (Ordinance No. 2 of August 13, 1912, 1912) in the Japanese colonial era, the entire 1,080 E in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “Ground No. 1”) states that AB with an address in “Z” and the 5,027 E before J (hereinafter “Ground No. 2”), AB with an address in “Z” and the 1,158 E before R (hereinafter “Ground No. 3”), and the 1,158 land under subparagraphs 1 through 3 together with the land under each of the instant circumstances, AD with an address in “AC” are described as being subject to each of the respective circumstances.
b.(1) The land in the first instance of land division was divided into F 1,068 square meters and 12 square meters before G;
Since F.F. 1,068 was again divided into F. F. 579 square meters, H. 349 square meters, I bank 140 square meters.
The above lands became the land Nos. 1 through 4 of the currently listed list through the change of land category, conversion of area, and change of the name of administrative district.
(2) The land under Section 2 was partitioned into K 304 square meters and L 2,377 square meters, etc., and became the land Nos. 5 through 11, and 16 in the separate sheet following the change of land category and division, the conversion of the area, and the change of the name of the administrative district.
(3) The land under circumstances 3 became land Nos. 12 through 15 listed in the separate sheet through the change of land category, division, area conversion, and change of the name of the administrative district.
(Attachment List Nos. 1 through 15 together with land indicated “each of the instant lands.” The Plaintiffs withdrawn the lawsuit against the land Nos. 16 listed in the Attached List. (C)
(1) On May 6, 1952, the applicant’s address and name of the titleholder of the registry on May 6, 1952, when the application for compensation (A evidence 9-4) was enacted and promulgated by Act No. 31 of June 21, 194, and was repealed by Act No. 4817, Dec. 22, 1994; hereinafter “former Farmland Reform Act”) entered into force in the documents related to the issuance of land and the documents related to the issuance of farmland and the public records on each land of this case.