(영문) 대구지방법원안동지원 2015.07.20 2015가단20704

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원안동지원 2015.07.20 2015가단20704

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The defendant's 47,609,109 won against the plaintiff A, 47,009,109 won against the plaintiff B, and 50,000 won against the plaintiff C, respectively.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The network D (hereinafter “the network”).

Around 05:57 on June 30, 2014, around 05:57, he was driving his own 125C -K II Otop and was working in the direction of the chemical industrial complex in the direction of the deceased at the direction of the sub-section in the direction of the sub-section 6.4% (sway 6.4%) depending on the direction of the deceased, the two front roads of the 125C YU in the direction of the Gyeongdong-gun, the Gyeongan-K, the 125C -K 20 meters from the accident occurred (hereinafter referred to as “the otob in the case of this case”). The above road is a sub-section 1 and sub-section 1, and the deceased was driving in the direction beyond the central line from 20 meters prior to the occurrence of the accident.

2) The Defendant’s front part of the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle conflict with the Defendant’s front part of the front part of the front part of the vehicle (hereinafter “the instant accident”). The Defendant’s front part of the front part of the vehicle, which was driven by the Defendant’s front part of the front part of the front part of the vehicle beyond the central line, was driven by the Defendant’s front part of the front part of the vehicle (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

3) At the time of the instant accident, the deceased died of internal organ damage and excessive ex parte transfusions immediately after the instant accident. The deceased died of internal organ damage and excessive ex parte transfusion.

B. 1) The Plaintiff A and B are the parents of the deceased, who are co-inheritors, and the Plaintiff C is the deceased’s punishment. 2) The Defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with the Dong Transportation Co., Ltd., the owner of the Defendant vehicle.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 5 (including each number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the result of the verification of and the purport of the whole pleadings in this court

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs asserted that the accident of this case intrudes upon the center line of E, and do not studio, while it is a new wall time.

유사 판례

-대구고등법원 2016.01.26 2015나22367

-서울동부지방법원 2016.08.25 2015가단134383

-대구지방법원경주지원 2015.01.16 2014가단676

-대전지방법원홍성지원 2016.05.11 2015가단11410

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.28 2014가단5095025