logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.12.15 2017누71972
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The argument that the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance rendered in the trial is not significantly different from the argument of the court of first instance. However, even if the statement of evidence Nos. 6 and 10 submitted by the plaintiff in the court of first instance is added to existing evidence, it is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion.

Therefore, the reasoning for this court’s explanation is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification of “Evidence submitted by the Plaintiff” of 3rd 17th 17th of the judgment of the court of first instance as “Evidence submitted by the Plaintiff (including evidence submitted by the court of first instance)” as “Evidence submitted by the Plaintiff.” As such, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow