1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Basic facts

A. H Co., Ltd. was established on November 2, 2004 for the purpose of running the business of manufacturing and selling V and width, and the trade name before the trade name was changed on January 19, 2017 was “A” and “C Co., Ltd.” before the trade name was changed on December 24, 2009.

(B) below, regardless of the time to avoid confusion with Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “A”).

Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Co., Ltd”) was established on September 19, 2014 as a company established on September 19, 2014 for the purpose of running a V and part manufacturing business, and the A’s V business division was separated from A.

C. Defendant D, as the representative director of the Defendant Company, was discharged from work in A’s V business division until August 31, 2014.

On November 23, 2015, when the instant lawsuit is pending, A was decided to commence the instant lawsuit by the Changwon District Court 2015 Ma1063, and the Plaintiff, the representative director of A, deemed A as A’s custodian and taken over the instant lawsuit. On September 28, 2016, A was appointed from the Changwon District Court as a custodian of A and took over the instant lawsuit, but on January 10, 2017, A was appointed again from the Changwon District Court as a custodian of A and took over the instant lawsuit.

(hereinafter referred to as “B” for a portion unrelated to the status of the receiver. (e)

B A married with Defendant E on February 9, 2015, but a consultation has been married on or around February 9, 2015, and J and Defendant D are the same children of Defendant E (B).

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without a partial dispute, entry in Gap evidence 1, 2, and 12 (including branch numbers, if any);

The following shall be:

(i) the purport of the entire pleading / [the purport of the pleading]

2. Determination as to the claim for damages caused by the tort

A. On March 3, 199, the gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1 B operated the business of manufacturing and selling V with the trade name “K” by lending the name of “K”, and even after the establishment of “K, E, etc., registered the title of shares and substantially operated “A”, and the Defendant, the wife, is the Defendant.