logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.16 2017나29575
보험금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following "2. Additional Judgment" as to the assertion emphasized by the defendant in this court. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance

2. The defendant asserts that the plaintiff's disability is caused by king evidence, and it is not caused by the accident of this case, and it does not constitute an insurance accident stipulated in the insurance clause of this case.

The term “overgoing accidents” among the “overgoing accidents,” which are the requirements of the insurance accidents stipulated in the instant insurance clause means all the causes of injury or death, which are caused by external factors, not due to physical defects of the insured, i.e., physical diseases, physical physical factors, etc., and the causal relationship between the external nature of such accidents and the result of injury or death, bears the burden of proof of the claimant for insurance.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2013Da210466 Decided July 10, 2014 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2013Da210466, Jul. 10, 201). In general, in cases where a causal relationship between the injury caused by an accident and the death or disability, which is the result of the accident, is acknowledged, the insured is liable to pay insurance proceeds as agreed

(See Supreme Court Decision 2006Da42610 Decided October 11, 2007, etc.). In light of the following: (a) the slip dow and fish medication were slip dow on the side of the patient’s records at the emergency medical center’s center in the following day of the instant accident in 2006Da42610, respectively; (b) the written evidence Nos. 3 through 5, 17, 18, 25, and 30; (c) the written evidence No. 12, No. 266; and (d) the first instance court’s commission of physical examination to the director of the Hanyang University Hospital in the first instance court; and (d) there were several blood transfusions from slip dow

In fact, on February 14, 2014, C Hospital's name of the Plaintiff's sick tree is growing.

arrow