The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) confirmed the identification card when the instant juveniles were exposed to it for the first time on February 2012. At the time, the juveniles showed the identification card that they had forged, and did not have to be mistaken for the adult by making a serious cremation. Since then on May 25, 2012, the Defendant did not verify the identity card again with the juveniles on the day of the instant case.

Therefore, the court below found the defendant guilty on the ground that the defendant had no intention to sell liquor to juveniles.

2. According to each evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant, around 20:00 on May 25, 2012, the court below acknowledged the fact that the defendant sold E, H, F, G, etc. (hereinafter the "juvenile of this case") 3 diseases, 1 diseases, and 4 diseases, etc. from E, H, E, E, E, and E, G, etc. (hereinafter the "Juvenile of this case") to the juvenile of this case. In addition, the juvenile of this case was found in the above restaurant operated by the defendant two times on and around February 4, 2012, before the occurrence of this case in the court below, and drinking alcohol, but the defendant testified that he had no record of an identification card on one occasion, as argued by the defendant, there was no evidence to acknowledge that the juvenile of this case was forged, and the witness F, without being aware of the defendant's identity card, the defendant's assertion that the juvenile of this case was sold to the juvenile of this case without being aware of the defendant's identity card.

3. Conclusion, the defendant.