A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and engages in driving service of automobiles by making a franchise.

On March 26, 2017, 200:08, a person who was under influence of B with alcohol content of 0.136% during blood, driving a car, and driving the car at a speed that is impossible to identify one-lanes depending on one-lane road of 386, Doncheon-ro, Doncheon-ro, Doncheon-ro, Don-ro, Don-ro, 386, from the parallel side of the Dong-gu.

In such cases, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle to prevent accidents by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as reporting the traffic situation well and accurately manipulating the steering gear, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting this, was driving by negligence while driving under the influence of alcohol, was driven by C(AW, 53 years old) before the direction of the driving.

The back part of the DNA-learning car was received by Defendant as the front part of the above vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victims of the above occupational and practical injury, such as brain-dead sugar and fluoral salt in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. On April 25, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment or two years of suspended execution due to a crime of violating road traffic laws at the District Court of the Republic of Korea on April 25, 2014, and on January 24, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of six million won or more due to a crime of violating road traffic laws at the same court on January 24, 2013, and was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of six million won or more.

On March 26, 2017, around 20:08, 200 Dobcheon-ro, 285-ro 285 at the street in front of the same city road, from approximately 771m section to the new road of 386-ro 386-ro, the respondent driven Bho-do motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.136% in blood.

As a result, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice, and drives a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.