The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On November 2016, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime against the Victim C, released the Victim C to E located in Daegu D building, “I wish to pay the cost to the Hamman up to January 2017, 2017, by shipping Bnnn L N70/140 C’s Employment Support Group to E located in Daegu D.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant had no particular property at the time, and the obligation to the Customer F was KRW 32 million, KRW 35 million, KRW 100 million, and KRW 400 million, and KRW 32 million, inasmuch as the obligation to the Customer F was limited to KRW 32 million, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the full amount to the victim.

On November 2016, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim take advantage of the amount of KRW 4,021,710, KRW 1,741, KRW 1,741, KRW 837, KRW 837, KRW 1,93,470, KRW 5,955,180, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 1,741, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 200,

B. On January 2, 2017, the Defendant committed a crime against the Defendant on the Defendant’s window ice Co., Ltd., Ltd., the Defendant would make payment to the Defendant on January 2, 2017 by the end of the following month.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any particular property as stated in Paragraph 1 at the time, and the amount of debt was a total of KRW 567 million, but the amount of credit was over KRW 32 million, so there was no intention or ability to pay the textile processing cost to the victim.

On January 2, 2017, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim process the fiber amounting to KRW 9,009,385, and around February 7, 2017, 3,728,340, and did not pay a total of KRW 12,737,725, and did not pay a total of KRW 12,737,725.

2. The intent of defraudation, which is a subjective constituent element of the judgment fraud, is the crime of fraud.