(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.03.13 2015노133 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.03.13 2015노133

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

The judgment below

Part concerning Defendant B and C shall be reversed.

Defendant

B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

(b).

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A’s punishment is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentence against the Defendants on the prosecutor (the Defendant A: imprisonment of eight months, confiscation and collection KRW 7,700,000, Defendant B, and C: imprisonment of six months and suspension of execution of two years) is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.

2. The act of arranging sexual traffic to Defendant A does not have any social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and it is necessary to cut off and severe punishment even in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic business establishments, and to establish a sound sexual culture. On February 6, 2013, the act of arranging sexual traffic committed an offense of violating the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, etc. Act after being sentenced to 2 years of a suspended sentence on June, 2013 and being sentenced to 6 years of a suspended sentence, but committed the offense of this case during the suspended sentence, and even after being sentenced to a fine, the act of arranging sexual traffic was committed. On the other hand, Defendant A led to the confession of and against the crime of this case; the period of the crime of this case; the size of profits acquired from the crime; the other records and arguments on the crime of Defendant A's age, family environment before and after the crime, etc., the court below's judgment is too harsh or too harsh.

3. Defendant B and C’s judgment on the instant crime is the confession of and against the instant crime, the fact that Defendant B does not have the same criminal record, etc. However, Defendant B committed the instant crime while being tried as a crime of violating the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.), Defendant C had the same criminal record once, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, including Defendant B, C’s age, character and family environment, and circumstances before and after the instant crime.

참조조문

-성매매알선 등 행위의 처벌에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2015.02.06 2014노4788

-인천지방법원 2014.02.14 2013노3453

-인천지방법원 2015.06.12 2015노784

-인천지방법원 2014.09.19 2014노1707

-인천지방법원 2015.11.27 2015노3601