logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.25 2016나85257
보험금
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked.

2. The plaintiffs' claims against the above revocation portion are all made.

Reasons

A. A. Basic Facts * prime contract - Insurance premium: Insurance premium - Insurance premium - Insurance premium - Insurance premium - Insurance premium - Insurance premium - Insurance premium - Insurance premium - Insurance premium - Insurance premium - Insurance premium - Insurance premium - Insurance premium - Insurance premium - Insurance premium 1,000: 11,000 won due to a disaster during the insurance period - Insurance premium - Insurance premium - Insurance premium 10,000 won due to a disaster during the insurance period - The Defendant on July 31, 2008 and the Defendant on July 31, 2008; the South East Eastern Sea (E; hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”); the beneficiary of the insurance at the time of death as legal heir (hereinafter referred to as “the insurance contract in this case”); and the main contents of the contract are as follows:

On July 17, 2012, the Deceased transferred to the Army on September 16, 2012, and was on duty as a small gun, and died after having been on duty at the point of 25 meters in the Dominium (GOP) located in the steel source located in Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-do, and at the point of 14:43 on March 17, 2013, the Deceased died.

On June 24, 2013, the Defendant paid KRW 70,000,00 to the Plaintiffs, the sole heir, as the parent of the Deceased, under the main contract of the instant insurance contract.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3 and 4 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In light of the Plaintiff’s assertion that the head part of the deceased’s body was affected by two mains of the deceased, and that there was a tension on both descendants, etc., the deceased’s death is the death of the deceased. Even if a person committed domestic suicide, the deceased was cruel from an appointed soldier, who was in front of the patrol in the register on the day of his death, and who was deprived of free will due to serious stress on steel work.

If so, the deceased's death constitutes a disaster stipulated in the insurance contract of this case, and the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiffs a disaster death benefit.

3. No. 8 of the deceased’s death is determined as to whether the deceased’s death was killed.

arrow