The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Summary of Facts charged

A. On July 15, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim D (35 years, south) who was driving on behalf of the driver for the last car volume of his C C in front of Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the ground that he did not properly find a destination, on the ground that he was unable to find the destination, and then tried to refund the substitute fee one time on his hand.

B. The Defendant’s insult, like the above “A”, publicly insultingd the victim by putting the victim “low sprink sprinks and sprinks” out of being observed by the victims, who were represented by the victim D, a substitute engineer, on the ground that the victim D did not have properly found his destination after receiving 112 reports.

Maz.

A. In the case of assault, an offense of non-competence (Article 260(3) and (1) of the Criminal Act), and an offense subject to prosecution subject to prosecution (Article 312(1) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act)

B. After the prosecution of this case, the victim's expression of non-existence of punishment and revocation of complaint of this case [the victim does not want punishment against the defendant in this court]

In this case, the complaint was withdrawn by the defendant's expression of intent to punish the insult which is an offense subject to victim's complaint.

It is reasonable to see (see Supreme Court Decision 2007Do425 decided Apr. 13, 2007)

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 5 and 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);