A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:20 on September 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) asked questions about the circumstances of the instant case from G and H, the background leading up to the F District Department of the Nowon-gu Seoul Nowon-gu Police Station, which was called up after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant interfered with the business; (b) asked him about the circumstances of the instant case; (c) asked him/her for a presentation of his/her identification card at the location of the said restaurant operator, etc.; (d) sent him/her a bath about G and G; (e) sent him/her five times his/her chest by hand; and (e) sent him/her five times his/her finger by hand; and (e) assaulted him/her about the process of videoing the Defendant’s act with a Handphone; and (e) assaulted him/her five times his/her chest.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement prepared by G, H and I;

1. Application of investigation report (a photograph of an extraction of dynamic image recorded on the face of a crime), photographs (in the case of an offense, the suspect spawns of the victim and his spawns of the victim), and the application of statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Part concerning the rejection of prosecution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the violation of law and the absence of a criminal record of a fine or heavier punishment);

1. On September 16, 2014, at the restaurant of "E" located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, around 22:20, the Defendant was asked the victim G and the victim H about the circumstances of the instant case, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 that the business interfered with the business, and the Defendant was requested to present his identification card from the victim G at the location of the above restaurant operator I and the employeeJ, etc., and the Defendant was able to view the victim G due to the following reasons: (a) whether the above restaurant operator I and the employeeJ, etc., is Chewing, and in accordance with the same manner, the Defendant took a desire to read "E" in the same restaurant; and (b) the victim H is in accordance with this new, low-quality, and the inspection of his identification card, and inspection.