The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Seized evidence 1 to 4 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall possess goods identical with or similar to the designated goods on which another person's registered trademark or any other trademark similar thereto is marked, for the purpose of transfer or delivery.

그럼에도 피고인은 2016. 3. 30. 14:52경 김해시 B에 있는 피고인이 운영하는 ‘C’ 매장에서 ‘루이비똥 말레띠에’사가 대한민국 특허청에 등록한 루이비똥 상표(제0109060호)와 동일하거나 유사한 상표가 표시된 루이비똥 가방 5개(증 제1호), ‘샤넬’사가 대한민국 특허청에 등록한 샤넬 상표(제0309448호)와 동일하거나 유사한 상표가 표시된 샤넬 지갑 1개(증 제2호), ‘구치오구치쏘시에떼퍼아찌오니’사가 대한민국 특허청에 등록한 구치 상표(제0132874호)와 동일하거나 유사한 상표가 표시된 구치 가방 1개(증 제3호), ‘프라다 에스. 에이’사가 대한민국 특허청에 등록한 프라다 상표(제0404466호)와 동일하거나 유사한 상표가 표시된 프라다 가방 1개(증 제4호)를 판매하기 위하여 소지하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant committed the infringement of trademark rights.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of subparagraphs 1 through 4 of this Article;

1. Relevant Article 93 of the Trademark Act concerning facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (including the fact that there is only one time before and after a fine for a different species of crime, the fact that the crime was committed, the circumstances leading to the crime, the scale of the crime, etc.);

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. Article 97-2 (1) of the Trademark Act that is confiscated;