logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.09.08 2015가단106578
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 63,385,979 as well as 5% per annum from January 6, 2014 to September 8, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The Plaintiff is the victim of the traffic accident under the following, and the Defendant is the insurer of B-car (hereinafter referred to as “A-car”).

B. 1) Date and time of accident: On January 6, 2014, at around 06: 06: (a) the accident location: (b) the 1139 North Korea North Korea Security Center 2nd, as Chungcheong-gun: (c) the day and time of the accident; (d) C was driving a sea-off vehicle at the time and time of the accident; (e) the two-lanes of the two-lane roads adjacent to the above accident area at the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si; (e) the progress signal at the front bank was already changed in red, but (e) the Plaintiff was trying to make the right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-off; (e) the Plaintiff’s remaining-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand-hand right-off.

C. According to the facts of the above recognition, the defendant is liable for all damages suffered by the plaintiff who was involved in the accident by a sea-going vehicle as the insurer of the sea-going vehicle.

In relation to the judgment of the defendant's argument of offsetting negligence, the defendant asserts that since the accident place at the time is not divided into the sidewalk and the roadway, the plaintiff should pass along the side side or the side side side of the road opposite to the vehicle and the horse, since the plaintiff was negligent in passing through the roadway, not the above place, such negligence should be considered in calculating the amount of damages that the defendant should compensate

Therefore, we can see, ...

arrow