logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2014.12.19 2014나1168
소유권지분이전등기 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is as follows: the court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of the plaintiff's testimony of Gap evidence Nos. 7 through 17 (including serial numbers) and the witness Z of the court of first instance, which are insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion as additional evidence submitted at the court of first instance. Thus, it is cited by applying the main text of Article 420

2. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow