logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.03.19 2014고단8618
청소년보호법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall openly distribute any media product harmful to juveniles, which is an outdoor advertisement under the Outdoor Advertisements, etc. Control Act to any place through which the general public pass.

Nevertheless, around November 3, 2014, the Defendant distributed the leaflets of the size of the name at a place where the passage of general public, such as the Japanese entertainment workers in Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam-gu District, is frequent. The former part of the former part, along with the phrase “after the selection of a place,” stating the female photograph of the tea in his/her own clothes, to suggest sexual traffic on the background, constitutes a harmful media product for juveniles publicly notified by the Minister of Gender Equality and Family.

Accordingly, the defendant openly distributed the leaflets corresponding to media products harmful to juveniles to the public at the places where the general public pass.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Unauthorized control sites, photographs and investigation reports on the sexual traffic advance complex;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 59 Subparag. 4 of the Act on the Punishment of Criminal Crimes and Articles 19(1) of the Juvenile Protection Act (elective of Imprisonment) are as follows: (a) since the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000 on September 28, 2012 due to a crime of violating the Juvenile Protection Act, only one of the crimes of the same kind; (b) seven times of the suspension of indictment; and (c) on January 14, 2014, the Seoul East Eastern District Court was sentenced to a punishment of imprisonment for six months for the same crime at the Seoul East East District Court and was detained in court on April 3, 2014; and (d) even if the Defendant was sentenced to a punishment of KRW 50,00,00 for the same crime, the Defendant committed the instant crime

In light of the above point, it is inevitable to sentence the Defendant’s sentence.

I would like to say.

Furthermore, the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of crime, and circumstances after crime, shall be determined as ordered.

arrow