All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor on the grounds of appeal (misunderstanding of facts), the Defendants were aware at the time of committing the crime that their activities interfered with the victims’ trial duties, and as such, the Defendants were in fact interfered with the trial duties.

2. Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below in light of the records, the evidence of this case based on the judgment of the court below alone was intentional to obstruct the Defendants from the judicial affairs of the J union disciplinary action, or the Defendants interfered with the above disciplinary affairs.

For the reasons that it is difficult to conclude this part of the facts charged as not guilty is just and acceptable, and since no new evidence corresponding to this part of the facts charged has been submitted in the trial at the same time, there is an error of misunderstanding of facts as alleged by the prosecutor in the judgment of the court below.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals are without merit.