(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.07.16 2012가합22339

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.07.16 2012가합22339

손해배상(의)

Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The party-related network D(E) is a person who died while being inspected by the defendant hospital, and the plaintiff A is the husband of D, the plaintiff B and C are the children of D.

B. D Around August 10, 2011, around 10:38, 201, she taken clothes CT in which the clothes and respiratory difficulties have deteriorated, and as a result, she was satisfying in both satisfys and observed multiple times. D applied to the Defendant hospital to undergo outpatient treatment at the Defendant hospital around 10:00 on August 28, 2011. (2) In order to distinguish whether the satch of the satisfy in D and to verify multiple causes, around 10:38, 201, the Defendant hospital confirmed that the satisfy test and the satch of the satch and the satch of the satisfy, and conducted the satch of the satch and the satisfych of the satch 5:5.5.5.15.36mc and 8.6m of the satch of the satch.

3) Around 16:33 of the same day, the Defendant hospital determined that it is necessary for a more detailed prosecutor to have D, and the Defendant hospital instructed 80cc of the 19:58 of the same day to have D in preparation for the pre-inspection, and administered 80cc of the 16:33 of the same day to ensure that appropriate water can be supplied during the laging period. 4) The Defendant hospital taken a brupt Mady using the steering agents to D at around 19:58 of the same day. As a result of the examination, it was confirmed that there was an opinion of crusium on both sides, and that the crusa and plecosa were carried out.

5) After completing the MRI inspection, the Defendant hospital: (a) ordered D to take a call, which enables D to put the head in place in preparation for the internal border inspection, which was scheduled on the following day; (b) around 23:25 of the same day, even though D intended to put the Gu territory on 23:25 of the same day, it showed a stable opinion after taking a progress control. (c) D had conducted a diagnostic inspection on September 9, 201; (b) around 08:08 of the same day; (c) at around 08:50 of the same day; and (d) at around 13:40 of the same day, 13:40 of the same day.

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2015.02.16 2013나53986

-인천지방법원 2019.12.17 2017가합60276

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.07 2015가단5373586

-서울서부지방법원 2012.12.13 2011가합5974

-전주지방법원 2017.09.05 2014가단24183 (1)