The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the victim’s statement and written diagnosis of injury as to the summary of the grounds for appeal, the court below erred in the misapprehension of legal principles and acquitted the Defendant.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, the lower court determined that it is difficult to believe that the Defendant’s statement that the Defendant inflicted a bodily injury on the Defendant’s own horse was not sufficient to recognize that the Defendant sustained a bodily injury on the part of the Defendant, on the sole basis of the written injury diagnosis, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that there was an injury on the part

1) It is difficult for the Defendant to understand formally that he was pushed ahead of the driver’s seat, not the chief direction, when premised on the statement of E that he was able to take the Defendant’s desire and carried the hand with his own driver’s seat window, and carried the hand, which he was pushed ahead of the driver’s seat.

2) In this Court, E was milked behind the end due to the operation of the driver's seat after being milked by the 45 degrees of 45 degrees in the operation of a flat.

It is difficult to eliminate the doubt that the police made a statement several times, and the above statement was made, and thus, emphasizes the above circumstances in order to exaggeration its damage.

3) Even if at the time E was not faced with head, a hospital was diagnosed as being diagnosed to have suffered brain sugar by appealing symptoms of cerebral cerebral tyrosis, such as two pains.

B. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, the instant facts charged was not sufficiently proven, in addition to the aforementioned circumstances that the lower court properly explained by the lower court for the determination of the party deliberation:

The judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there are errors in the misapprehension of facts and legal principles alleged by the prosecutor.

shall not be deemed to exist.

1) Of the results of the medical record reply submitted as evidence in the trial of the party, the passing date is indicated as “sucking with the driver’s expense-to face sealed,” but this is the patient.