The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. On January 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 12:00 on January 5, 2014, the Defendant: (b) committed assault against the victim by putting the son and the son and son, who was the opposite son, in front of the Escopian parking station in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, to prevent the opposite son and son from entering the third floor of the distribution of the third floor; and (c) committed assault against the victim.

2. For the purpose of proving the facts charged in this case, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor is the victim's statement that the victim's satisfe's satisfe's satisfe's satisfe's satisfe's satfe's satisfe's satfe's sat, and that the defendant's satisf'

According to the above video, who was found to have been in the above time, at the above place, the victim's son and son was found to have been milched after the victim's timber was followed, but it is not confirmed that the son's son's son and son's son's son's son's son and son's son's son's son'

Rather, the Defendant’s hand-on, which had been a hand-on knife the Defendant’s hand-on knife, made a statement to the effect that the Defendant knife the hand-on knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife. However, the victim’s statement to the effect that the Defendant knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

Ultimately, the evidence presented by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize the facts charged of this case.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act is applied.