logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.03.22 2016가단31014
사해행위취소
Text

1. The sales contract concluded on January 29, 2013 between Defendant A and C on January 29, 2013 on the 1 and 2 real estate listed in the separate sheet between Defendant A and C is 27,104.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 20, 201, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking reimbursement of KRW 30,00,000 with C and insurance coverage amounting to KRW 30,00,000, and insurance period from July 20, 2011 to July 19, 2012. The Plaintiff concluded a travel intermediary business guarantee insurance contract with the insured Gangwon-do Tourism Association. The Plaintiff filed a claim for reimbursement of KRW 30,000,000 as damages arising from breach of the agreement with the Gangwon-do Tourism Association due to failure to perform the agreement with the said Association. On November 12, 2012, the Plaintiff paid KRW 30,000,000 to the Gangwon-do Tourism Association for KRW 30,000,000,000 to KRW 30,000,000,000 with the Gangwon-do Tourism Association for the total amount of KRW 30,000,000,0000 to KRW 30,313130,27.

B. C’s disposal of real estate 1) On January 29, 2013, as indicated in the separate sheet between Defendant A and Defendant A (hereinafter “instant real estate Nos. 1 and 2”).

35,000,000 won (the first sale contract of this case) for sale to Defendant A of KRW 35,000 (the first sale contract of this case, KRW 20,000,000, and KRW 15,000 for the second real estate) (hereinafter “instant first sale contract”).

(2) On January 30, 2013, at the time of the First Sale Contract of this case, C owned three real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “third real estate of this case”) with active property of the market value of KRW 20,274,000 (hereinafter “instant third real estate”) and KRW 180,000 (hereinafter “D apartment”) with D Apartment No. 401, 403 (hereinafter “D apartment”) with respect to the foregoing D apartment of KRW 401, 30,000 (hereinafter “the maximum debt amount of 130,00,000,000) with respect to E, but the mortgage was established in the name of F, which is the maximum debt amount of KRW 130,00,000 with respect to E as the debtor.

arrow