1.(a)

Plaintiff

A, 1 Defendant C, 8,400,000 won, and 5% per annum from May 23, 2015 to August 25, 2015.

1. The cause of the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant D: as shown in the attached Form “the cause of the claim against Defendant D”.

Grounds for Recognition: the main sentence of Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. The remainder of the plaintiffs' claims (the plaintiffs' respective claims against defendant D and Seoul Guarantee Insurance, and the plaintiffs' claims against defendant Eul's Seoul Guarantee Insurance)

A. Basic facts 1) Defendant C is a real estate broker who operated “F” under Article 101 of the Seocheon-gu Etel 101 in Bupyeong-gu, Busan. Defendant D is a real estate broker who operated the “H” in G, and the Plaintiffs are the lessees who concluded each lease contract by the brokerage of the said Defendants as follows:

B) On the other hand, Defendant C and D respectively leased part of Defendant C and D’s guarantee, respectively, as “real estate broker’s business guarantee under the Act rented on the Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions,” and (2) each of the instant lease agreements was concluded between Defendant C and D as “10 million won.” Defendant C and D’s brokerage, and Defendant C and D’s each of the instant lease agreements was paid to Plaintiff I for the lease deposit on April 13, 2013, respectively, at the time of contract or delivery (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). The details are as follows: (a) the lease agreement term of the leased object of the contract is 10,500,000 won; and (b) the lease agreement is 20,000,000 won to Defendant C and D’s real estate agent on April 13, 2013 through April 21, 2013, respectively.