The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (eight months of imprisonment).

2. The judgment that the defendant recognized his mistake, and the fact that the defendant sought and agreed to use the letter for the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties is favorable to the defendant, but there is a history of punishment against the defendant for narcotics-related crimes, and narcotics-related crimes need to be strictly punished in terms of social harm and risk of recidivism, and the defendant's act of assaulting the police officer to commit the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties of this case is disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, circumstances before and after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc., and other various circumstances that are conditions for the punishment as shown in the records, such as the motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, the situation leading to the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, etc.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.