beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The sentence imposed by the court below (five months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The Defendant seems to have recognized the entirety of the instant crimes and divided his mistake in the trial.
Furthermore, at the investigation stage, the Defendant came to reach an agreement with the victim F of the instant special larceny crime, and the said victim did not want the punishment of the Defendant.
In this context, each of the instant crimes appears to have been committed on April 1, 2014 with the concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, considering equity with the case where the judgment was rendered on April 1, 2014 (two months of imprisonment) and the concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act. The fact that each of the instant crimes appears not to be serious damage to the victims due to each of the instant crimes, and that the Defendant was dead at his parents’ divorce and under his grandparents, and sent to the childcare center upon the death of his father at the fourth grade of elementary school. The Defendant appears to have been 18 years of age since 2009, while making it difficult for the Defendant to live in the school without a certain address after leaving the school in the middle school and making it difficult for him to live in the same kind of crime. At the time of the instant crime, the fact that the Defendant had the most favorable responsibility for the Defendant’s family members, such as a child born in de facto marriage.
However, the crime of this case, in collaboration with the above defendant C, stolen the credit card from the victim F owned by the victim F (C), which was far away from the soup floor, and then presented it to the victim U.S. who is his own owner, and then acquired the property from the victims by using a stolen credit card for a total of five times, such as receiving two punishments, i.e., the above victim., taking the property from the victims. The punishment for the illegality of the act is not weak.
(b).