beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Obstruction of business;
A. On July 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 14:30 on July 21, 2017, at the E-cafeteria operated by the Victim D in Jeju; (b) demanded the said cafeteria employee F to provide food free of charge; and (c) made the Defendant’s speech that it cannot be identified to customers; and (d) demanded the employee F to restrain the Defendant from departing from the restaurant.
For the reason that the demand was made, it was difficult to avoid disturbance about 20 minutes, such as gathering the dispute that he was placed in his own place, taking the attitude that he seems to be at the time of drinking the F.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.
B. On July 22, 2017, around 11:45, at the fourth floor of the I Hospital managed by G in Jeju, the Defendant was unable to undergo a diagnosis due to the fact that he was forced to leave the hospital before, and was under the influence of alcohol, and the patient’s guardian’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her sher
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the management of the victim's hospital by force.
(c)
On July 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was a person who is accommodated with the Victim K in Jeju-si Lneep, and was under the influence of alcohol at around 02:00 on July 23, 2017, the Defendant was able to avoid disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as taking a bath for the victim of a fire on the ground that he was under the influence of alcohol by using a portable gas siren, and taking a bath for the victim on the ground of fire risk; (b) placing the victim with drinking alcohol; and (c) placing the victim with a beer disease; and (d) taking a attitude that seems to have been able to harm the victim.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's female business by force.
2. The Defendant is a victim of special intimidation, who is a other customer, who is well-grounded in the foregoing female accommodation at the same time and at the same place as that of paragraph 1(c).