logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.04.26 2017고정94
자동차손해배상보장법위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) had D operate the said vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, from the sperm distance located in the motion picture dong in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si on October 31, 2016 to the 188-day road at the same time; and (b) had D operate the said vehicle.

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written statement of vehicle operation and on-site crackdown photographs;

1. Mandatory insurance inquiries (the defendant did not know that the above vehicle was not covered by mandatory insurance, and thus did not intend to commit a crime of violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages;

However, as long as the defendant had D operate the above vehicle without confirming whether the defendant subscribed to the mandatory insurance while taking over the above vehicle, the defendant's above assertion by the defendant is recognized as willful negligence. Therefore, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions of Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (Considering the fact that the Defendant was under control in obtaining an estimate of mandatory insurance, and that there was some points to take into account the fact that the Defendant subscribed to mandatory insurance and the details and details of this case);

arrow