logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.05.07 2020누31936
신고수리의무부존재확인등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the judgment of first instance. However, even if all of the evidence submitted by the court of first instance and each statement of evidence No. 40 submitted in the court of first instance are examined, it is difficult to deem that the plaintiff has standing to seek revocation of the disposition of this case.

Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420

【Supplementary Parts 11 '2 '2 '2 '2 '2 '2 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '

'in addition'.

2. Thus, the lawsuit of this case is dismissed as it is unlawful, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow