logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.08.30 2015누69494
장애연금급여미해당결정취소 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, in addition to adding “the result of the commission of the appraisal of medical records to the director of the Han forest University of the first instance and the director of the same-sex hospital of the first instance court,” which is the same as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

(3) The court below's decision to dismiss the plaintiff's claim on February 2, 201 is justified, since the plaintiff's appeal is justified as it is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, since the plaintiff's appeal is justified as it is without merit.

arrow