A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records】 On March 22, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten-month imprisonment with prison labor for a false accusation at the Daegu District Court.

【Criminal fact-finding on April 12, 2017, at the public service center of the Busan District Public Prosecutor’s Office located in Yongsan-gu, Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office, Daegu District Office, Daegu District Office, in the blank, the Defendant sent two police officers (D, E) under the name of the U.S. police station C district unit belonging to the Defendant, Daegu District Office, Daegu District Office, Daegu District Office, and arrested the complainant A as a crime of refusing to withdraw from the F Station Office on March 17, 2017, and the complainant forced him/her to go back and forced him/her to go back, despite the demand of the Defendant to present the reason for appointment and arrest of the counsel (the so-called “the so-called U.S. principle”), and it is apparent that the complainant forced to go to the district and detained the complainant illegally by abusing his/her authority and abusing his/her authority. Therefore, the time for taking the Defendant’s lawsuit thoroughly into consideration it.

“A written complaint,” stating that “A police officer who belongs to the District Court at the time of the same purport as the above written complaint was prepared and submitted to the staff in charge of receipt of the written complaint, and received an investigation in the capacity of a complainant from the subordinate branch office of the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office on June 13, 2017, and did not notify the “U.S. Principles” including whether the police officer who arrested the Defendant as a current criminal and arrested him as an unperson under his/her name

was stated.

However, the facts revealed that the above police officer D was called to the scene at the time, and the F Station president again requested the defendant to leave the service room, and the above police officer's refusal to leave the service room, so the defendant still notified the "Saman principle", including the summary of the suspected fact of refusing to leave, and notified the defendant that he was arrested as a current offender, and although the defendant tried to keep his hand and hand in the future, the police officer did not inform the police officer of the doctrine that he would be punished for the above police officer.