(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.02.18 2015고정1994

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.02.18 2015고정1994

위증

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 22, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the Daegu District Court No. 146, Daegu-gu, Daegu-ro, Daegu-ro, 364, and the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s case, in violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) against No. 146, 2014.

Defendant is known to the above presiding judge who is trying the above case, and “D is known to be accused by E on June 2010, and the witness has not filed a complaint against D, and shall not be memory for the sexual traffic.

“The testimony was made.”

However, on April 2010, the Defendant was guilty of violating the full taxi management system with respect to D, and the Defendant was subject to a separate investigation on November 29, 2013 in the investigation department of the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station, Daegu District Public Prosecutor's Office (Seoul District Public Prosecutor's Branch Office No. 2013 type No. 34858) and filed a civil petition against D representative director F in the Daegu District Public Prosecutor's Office, and withdrawn it.

“As stated to the effect that it was well aware of the true fact of D.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Copy of the protocol of examination of witness A (defendant) of the Daegu District Court 2014 No. 146 on witness of the case No. 146;

1. A copy of the protocol of examination of the suspect of the accused (a copy of the subordinate branch office of the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office (No. 34858) of the police prosecutor's office;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C;

1. The response data and a copy of the judgment [the defendant and the defense counsel filed a petition against a large number of taxi companies while working as the adviser of the Daegu taxi Workers' Union, and the testimony of this case was made by E before giving the testimony of this case, “A person filed a petition against D on the ground of a violation of the full management system.”

“The person who filed a petition against D at the time of the testimony of this case is called E.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.02.05 2015고단539

-대구지방법원 2016.06.03 2015노1594

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.05.16 2017고단1846

-대구지방법원 2021.01.27 2020나311365