1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 25, 2016, the Plaintiffs entered the Republic of Korea with the status of stay for “general training” (the expiration date: May 25, 2017) as the couple of Mongolian nationality.

(hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B” in sequence b.

Plaintiff

2. On February 7, 2017, the status of stay for general training was changed to the same group of status of stay (the expiration date: May 25, 2017).

C. After that, Plaintiff 1. was extended on May 19, 2017; Plaintiff 2, May 25, 2017, respectively, by August 25, 2017.

On August 23, 2017, the Plaintiffs again filed an application for extension of the period of stay with the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “application for extension”) and the Defendant rejected each extension decision on November 7, 2017 on Plaintiff 1 on the ground that “A lack of sojourn expenses” was denied as to Plaintiff 2 on the ground that “A lack of sojourn expenses” was rejected on November 7, 2017.”

(hereinafter collectively referred to as "each disposition of this case" and "disposition against 1. and 2. for each plaintiff" (which is grounds for recognition). 【No dispute exists, entry in Gap's 1 through 4, 7 through 11, Eul's 1, 2, and 3 evidence (which include various numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether each of the dispositions of this case is legitimate

A. Plaintiff 1. The Plaintiff 1 received training in Korean language from the Foreign Language Education Center of the Seodaemun University and has sufficient funds necessary to stay in Korea with Plaintiff 2.

Therefore, the disposition against the plaintiff 1. is illegal because there is a serious error in the fact-finding that is the basis of judgment on the exercise of discretion, and the disposition against the plaintiff 2. is also unlawful.

(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant statutes;

C. (A) Determination as to the legitimacy of the disposition against Plaintiff 1) The permission for extension of the period of sojourn under the Immigration Control Act is authorized to stay in Korea beyond the original period of sojourn for which permission was granted to the applicant and conduct activities falling under the status of sojourn.