1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 9, 2015, the Plaintiff, as a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of India (hereinafter “ India”), entered the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status.

On September 21, 2015, the date of expiration of the permission date shall be December 21, 2015, and on March 6, 2016.

On March 24, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for permission to change the status of stay on the ground that he/she wishes to receive a Korean language training from the Seoul Sungsung (Seoulsung) University of Science and Technology, and obtained the permission to change the status of stay on March 24, 2015 (D-4): and obtained the permission to extend the period of stay of general training twice as follows.

C. The Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for permission to change the status of stay to study (D-2) on February 26, 2016, on the ground that he/she would again complete the B master’s degree course at the graduate school of international science (hereinafter “master’s degree course”) prior to the expiration date of the said period of general training, and received the permission to change the status

(Completion Date: March 31, 2017) d.

On March 22, 2017, the Plaintiff received permission for extension of the period of study abroad (hereinafter referred to as “previous application for extension”) from the Defendant on April 18, 2017 (the expiry date: September 30, 2017).

E. On August 24, 2017, the Plaintiff applied for the extension of the period of study abroad again to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant application for extension”). On December 7, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision not to grant the extension of the period of sojourn (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the grounds of insufficient financial capacity, etc.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 10, 13, Eul 1, 2, 3, and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff's family members and Korea's meeting in India's family members and Korea's meeting, and Diplomatic Association's survey "the side" of India's meeting.

Registration fees, living expenses, etc. are subsidized from the Do.

Therefore, the plaintiff does not engage in illegal economic activities in the Republic of Korea.