logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.08.17 2015가합3946
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 188,439,935 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from May 27, 2014 to April 13, 2015 for the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition and judgment

A. The Plaintiff, under the trade name of “B, is a person who runs a wholesale and retail business of electrical and electronic parts and computer peripheral devices, and the Defendant is a company whose main business is the electronic settlement-related service business. On November 25, 2013, the supply value of the water (including value added tax) on the date of the supply of the water is 161,569,485 won and 28,551,490 won and 28,51,490 won and 32,316,60 won and 400 won on May 14, 2014, the Plaintiff concluded a contract with the Defendant on May 26, 2014, stating the supply value of the water (including value-added tax) in the quantity of the water from which the goods are supplied as KRW 161,569,360,02,360, and each of the above goods supplied as KRW 2935,300,000,00.

3) On February 17, 2015, the Plaintiff received KRW 20,000,000 from the Defendant as the price for goods. [Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff is a person, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (if there is a serial number, each entry and the purport of the whole pleadings, including a serial number).

B. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the remainder of KRW 188,439,935 (total amount of KRW 208,439,935 - total amount of KRW 20,000,000) and damages for delay at each rate of 6% per annum prescribed by the Commercial Act from May 27, 2014 to April 13, 2015, which is the day following the delivery date of the original copy of the instant payment order, and from the next day to the day of full payment, 20% per annum prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full payment.

2. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, on the ground that the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable.

arrow