logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.01.31 2017가합106101
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 296,208,426 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from July 1, 2017 to September 4, 2017, and the following.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who runs wholesale and retail business, such as PV pipes and construction materials, with the trade name of “B,” and the Defendant is a company that runs machinery and equipment construction business, specialized fire-fighting construction business, etc.

나. 피고는 2016. 4. 19. 주식회사 신태양건설로부터 ‘공주 신관동 공동주택 신축공사 중 기계설비공사’를 하도급받은 후, 2016년 6월경 원고와 위 공사에 필요한 PB-XL캇타 등 물품을 공급받되 그 물품대금은 매월 말일 결제하기로 합의하였다.

C. The Plaintiff supplied goods to the Defendant according to the foregoing agreement, and the supply value and supply value of the goods supplied between March and June 2017 are as listed below:

일시 품 목 공급가액(부가가치세 포함) 17년 3월 PB-XL캇타(수입) 외 47건 26,399,487 17년 4월 정티 ISO 16mm(애강) 외 158건 108,521,241 17년 5월 2040 DL/35(노백)-평화 외 129건 143,304,004 17년 6월 엘보 ISO 16mm(애강) 외 38건 36,978,611 합 계 315,203,343

D. The Defendant paid to the Plaintiff KRW 18,994,917 out of the amount of goods paid in March 2017.

【Ground of recognition】 Facts without dispute, entries in Gap’s evidence 1 through 4 (including additional number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 296,208,426 (i.e., the total amount of the unpaid goods - KRW 315,203,343 - the amount of the goods paid for the March - KRW 18,94,917) and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum as prescribed by the Commercial Act from July 1, 2017 to September 4, 2017, the delivery date of the original copy of the instant payment order, from the next day to the date of full payment.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, on the ground that the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable.

arrow