logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.07.03 2016누71586
수용재결처분취소
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the court of first instance except for the following “the part concerning dismissal or addition or new use” under Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The phrase “8,287 square meters” in the third place shall be deemed to be “3,287 square meters” under the third place.

On the other hand, “On the other hand, the deceased C also died on August 8, 2015, while the first instance lawsuit was pending, and Plaintiff D, the sole heir, took over the proceedings of the deceased C at the trial.”

The population of the 7th page 20 is changed to the “number of vehicles”.

The plaintiffs' claims for compensation for relocation expenses cannot be accepted on the grounds of deficiencies 7 and 8 are as follows: "In short, the plaintiffs' claims for compensation for relocation expenses cannot be accepted on the grounds of deficiencies; "M" in the 10th part of the same face is as "M"; "no," in the 12 and 13th part of the same face, the plaintiffs' claims for compensation for business shall be accepted"; and "L land" in the 16th part of the same face shall be deemed as "L land."

No. 48, 49, and "No. 48," of heading 20, 21.

Section 11.No. 13 shall be amended to the following:

5 Business compensation shall be made for a person who has carried on inland fisheries in his name after filing a report on inland fisheries and filing a business registration. The plaintiff A did not file a report on inland fisheries with respect to each fish farm of this case, and the net N merely is a person who has filed a report on inland fisheries in a formal manner, and the plaintiff D who succeeded to the plaintiff A and the net N cannot be a person eligible for business compensation.

The “8,201 square meters” in the 3rd place of the 13rd place is deemed as “8,291 square meters”; the “former” in the 4th place of the same 3rd place of the same 4th place of the same 4th place of the same 7th place of the same 7th place of the same 7th place of the same 7th place of the fishing ground.

Part 17, above, the table 1 below.

arrow