logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.11.05 2014고단8777
장물취득
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the horse trading business under the mutual name of “D” in Incheon reinforced Military C.

On August 17, 2009, the Defendant purchased halogic glama, lenoma, and ladropic laves from G, which is a business employee of F, operated by the victim E, from G, the Defendant purchased halogic halogic laves and ladrhic laves which is the victim’s possession.

At the time, the Defendant decided to purchase a large quantity of 40 to 50% price of the normal supply price from the above G, and the Defendant did not follow the ordinary payment method, such as the issuance of a tax invoice, unlike the time when the normal south goods purchase the safe test. The Defendant did not follow the ordinary payment method, such as the transfer of the price to the personal account in the name of the above G, not the account that the business employees of the victim received the safe payment, or the direct payment to the above G, by transferring the price to the personal account in the name of the above G, not the account that

As such, the Defendant, who is engaged in the trade in inland border, has a duty of care to examine whether the goods were properly released from G or the victim, etc., and whether the goods were supplied at the price that was set for a long time, not temporary, for a long time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected the determination of the stolen goods, and neglected the determination on the stolen goods, thereby purchasing 40,000 won in total in number by using 6,000 won from 8,000 won to 15,000 won per dog to 300,000 won from 15,00 won per dog to 48,000 won from the normal supply, with the normal supply of 40,000 won from 15,00 won per dog to 20,000 won per dog, as described in the attached list of crimes. In addition, the Defendant purchased 40,000 won in total from G during the period from April 5, 2013 to April 5, 2013.

arrow