Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On April 28, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for occupational embezzlement by the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on January 13, 2012.
[2014 Highest 4018]
1. From January 8, 2014, the Defendant has been employed by the victim BC located in the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City BB as the delivery source and has been engaged in delivery and collection affairs.
At around 09:00 on January 9, 2014, the Defendant: (a) completed the money in the agricultural and fishery products wholesale market located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and (b) embezzled cash of KRW 36,000, cash of KRW 50,000, and delivery of KRW 1,000,000 in the market price owned by the victim for the sake of the victim; and (c) embezzled cash of KRW 86,000 for the sake of the victim, on the pretext of the fact that he/she voluntarily consumed and did not return Orab, at around that time.
2. From January 20, 2014, the Defendant has been engaged in delivery and collection of money by being employed as delivery source to BG cafeterias operated by the victim BF in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City BE building 103.
At around 13:10 on January 20, 2014, the Defendant embezzled cash of KRW 126,600 on the ground of cash 50,000 received in advance from the victim and delivery 1,30,000 on the part of the victim’s market price owned by the victim for the sake of the victim, on the part of the victim, after completing delivery at the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City BH, Nam-gu, Incheon, and then embezzled cash of KRW 126,60 on the part of the victim.
[2014 Highest 4449] On January 7, 2014, the Defendant was employed as a delivery source to the “BK” restaurant operated by the Victim BJ in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and received from the victim for delivery and payment-related services, and then received from the victim, the victim-owned, delivery, and then delivered the victim with the food cost deposited at the time of the completion of delivery. However, the Defendant paid the victim with the food cost deposited at the time, KRW 40,000 and KRW 3LT100.