beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, as to Defendant B, C, and D, this shall not apply.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
D (B) On August 12, 2015, the Daejeon District Court sentenced on August 12, 2015 to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (D) and for a suspended sentence of ten months.
8.20 The above judgment became final and conclusive.
1. Defendant A, Defendant D, Defendant B, and Defendant E’s co-offenders conspired to open the door of a vehicle that is not corrected and steals money and goods. On August 9, 2015, Defendant B, Defendant B, and Defendant E came to the so-called “vehicle hair” parking lot of the H house located around the parking lot, around August 9, 2015, and Defendant D, Defendant D, and Defendant A found the key of the said car by opening and opening a door of the 4 million won car at the victim I’s market price owned by the victim at the parking lot. Defendant D, Defendant B, and Defendant E driving the said franchise and accompanied the said car by the said car, and Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant E stolen the said car with one string card owned by the victim, which was found within the said franchise.
As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.
2. Defendants A, B, and C, together with the J, conspired with the Defendant to take on and off the stolen passenger vehicle as described in paragraph (1) in the same manner, and they came to the so-called “vehicle hair” in the same manner. On August 9, 2015, around 18:09, Defendant A, C, and J reported the network within the said franchise, and Defendant B opened a door of 3 passenger vehicles owned by the victim K and cut down a door of 83,00 won in cash owned by the victim, Hyundai Card 1,00 won in the market value, including 33-1,00,000,000 won in New Card 1,000,000 won in cash owned by the victim, and 1,000,000 won in the market value.
Accordingly, the defendants stolen the victim's property in collaboration with J.
3. The defendant.