The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable condition that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, the health of the defendant's spouse aggravated due to their anti-competitive conditions, etc. However, although the defendant had been punished twice (two times of imprisonment) for the same kind of crime, the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of it even though he was suspended from indictment on the condition of completion of education at the prosecutor's office on May 1, 2013 due to the crime of medication of phiphonephone, even though he was sentenced to a suspension of indictment on the condition of completion of education at the prosecutor's office on May 1, 2013, the defendant's hair (6 to 10cm in length) was detected, and the range of the recommended sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court for each of the crimes of this case [basic crimes and 1, and 2 concurrent crimes: The punishment of the defendant on each of the crimes of this case is limited to the medication and simple possession of narcotics crime group, each of the basic areas, the defendant's age and motive of the crime of this case, etc.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.