The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below (one hundred months of imprisonment and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below has such favorable circumstances as the defendant's confession and confession of all of the crimes of this case, the defendant's cooperation in the investigation into the arrest of a narcotic offender, the defendant's family member is trying to help the defendant return to society. However, the defendant has been punished four times (4 times of imprisonment) for the same crime. The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for the same crime (10 months of imprisonment) and committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime without being aware of the release from prison, the defendant's hair was detected from philopon, the defendant's hair was detected from his hair, the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court for each of the crimes of this case [basic crime: Basic crime: Type 2 (b), purchase), such as the sale and purchase of a drug crime group, Type 3 (f) and administration of a drug crime), degree of aggravation, previous elements and areas of aggravation, the age limit of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the above crimes, the circumstances that the court below seems to be unfair, taking into account the circumstances of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.