Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of eight months and by a fine of five hundred thousand won.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On September 10, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court, and on April 6, 2016, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 5 million for the same crime, etc. at the same court.

1. On September 4, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (drawing driving) (drawing driving) driving a cubing vehicle to C in the vicinity of the KBS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S located in Ulsan-gu, New-dong, Seoul, without a driver’s license, while under the influence of 0.139% of alcohol during blood.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, as described in paragraph (1), was under control while driving a vehicle without drinking or without a license, and conducted a alcohol measurement by voluntarily accompanying the said district E zone located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, and then, the police officers belonging to the said district E zone recommended the Defendant to return home to the Defendant, and the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance by very rough words and actions within the government office, such as “this rings, Chewing h., within the internal key, h., during which the police officers are soliciting him to return home to the Defendant,” and intending to drive with the Defendant’s vehicle keys kept by the police officer without permission.

3. Within 23:40 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, and was injured by the Defendant, within the same day, the Defendant’s disturbance, such as the slope F and Police Officers G (23 taxes) belonging to the said global belt, prevented the Defendant from committing any act of disturbance as described in paragraph 2 of this paragraph, and solicits the Defendant to return home, threaten the Defendant as if he/she would turn back to drinking slopeF on several occasions, and considers that he/she would have to go back to G, and she “I saw, this ring

In doing so, “humbucks to the left side of G bucks” was broken.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties of Gman on the maintenance of order in the government offices and the control of disturbance, etc. in the government offices, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted an injury on Gman on the outside of the left-hand part requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Request for cooperation in investigation,