Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who serves as a bath manager in Dworka in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a bath manager.

At around 13:50 on January 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) took a bath in the south of the snives of the above snives, and had the victim E (the 60-year old) who was in the snives room shack and math in the snives room, and (b) took the snives of the snives of the snives to the snives of the snives while the snives of the snives of the snives of the snives of the snives of the snives

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A criminal investigation report (victim’s counseling process) (the victim’s witness E has consistently and specifically stated the facts of damage to the investigative agency and this court; the victim consulted on the instant case at a district group, and then recorded the conversation with the Defendant according to the police officer’s explanation; and there was no motive to make a false statement as to the facts of damage. The Defendant stated in the investigative agency that the Defendant was a deadly and divided the Defendant’s sexual organ, which was sent out during the maths, was the same as the victim’s misunderstanding. However, such a change is difficult to easily understand. In full view of these circumstances, the witness’s statement made by the witness E has credibility).

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 70 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 47(1) and Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from an order of disclosure and an order of notification, the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse have no record of identical crimes, and the Defendant was a bath manager who resided in a certain residence.