A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 5, 2013, at around 21:30, the Defendant: (a) demanded the victim’s main points of “D” operated by the victim C in the Seoul Western-gu B to request alcohol to the victim; (b) opened a studio in which other customers are located in the main office; and (c) took the studio in a large voice; and (d) obstructed the victim’s main office operation by force for approximately 30 minutes by allowing the victim to become the customers of the hudio.

2. On the front of the foregoing D main point, the Defendant was urged by the police officer, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Southern Police Station E zone, to return home from the police officer belonging to the Seoul Southern Police Station E zone, who was called out after receiving a report to handle the disturbance. However, the Defendant refused and continued to resist the disturbance. As the F arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender, such as interference with business, etc., and the F arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of official duties concerning the prevention, suppression, investigation, etc. of the police officer’s crime.

3. The Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender, such as the crime of interference with business, at the place specified in paragraph (2) at the time and time, and was placed in the back seat of the GYF patrol car used for the crime prevention patrol at the E-district of the Seoul Central Franc Police Station.

The Defendant, upon receiving his contact, resisted the Defendant’s wife H, who was accompanied by the patrol vehicle, and resisted why the police would dye the Defendant’s wife h along with the patrol vehicle, destroyed the front door of the patrol vehicle’s front door by walking several times, and damaged the public goods so that 149,864 won of the repair cost can be moved.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning C and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Articles 314(1) and 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. The aggravated Criminal Act for concurrent crimes.