Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty to drive a Grand Co., Ltd.

On August 26, 2015, the Defendant driven the above van on the 16:59 on August 26, 2015, and tried to proceed from the corner of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of movable property

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, in such a case, there was a duty of care to confirm whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a way to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and to safely drive the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and did not avoid the victim D (16) who cross the crosswalk from the left side to the right side by his negligence.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the removal of fats, which require approximately 10 weeks of treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of Part II, a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on actual conditions, four copies of field photographs, a drawing, and a diagnosis report;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The punishment of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order was serious injury to the victim for the reason of sentencing. However, various extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant repented his mistake, that the vehicle driven by the defendant is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, that the vehicle driven by the defendant is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, that the victim paid a sum of KRW 10 million to the victim, that the victim agreed to do so smoothly with the victim, and that the defendant