A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven a DSS5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.197% while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.197%, without obtaining a driver’s license, on the section of about 15km in Sincheon-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, from around 00:51 to the road in front of Sinpo-dong, Sinpo-dong, Sinpo-dong, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si.

2. On May 10, 2018, the Defendant has a person suspected of driving alcohol in the street prior to the maternal distance of his/her mother road at the time of his/her presentation on May 10, 2018.

“The” was demanded by F to present identification cards from F to a police officer affiliated with a police station E (a police box) of the Silung Police Station, who was reported 112, and sent to the scene, and the present status of the driver’s license was revoked, and the fine, which was sentenced to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (divated driving) around 2013, was discharged, and thus, was hot, and the G resident registration certificate issued by the Silung market in Gyeonggi-do, which the Defendant was in possession of the Defendant, was presented to the said police officer as his/her identification witness, and was exercised unlawfully

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (2) of this Article, conducted a measurement of drinking in the foregoing circumstances, and carried out a false document in the G’s name stating the driver’s opinion in the column of “G” and “G’s report on the result of drinking control” prepared by the police officer F of the House E in the Singu Police Station, using a color pen for the purpose of exercising the influence of alcohol, thereby forging a false private document on proving facts by signing the “G” and “G’s report on the result of drinking control” on the driver’s column. As such, the Defendant, who is a forged private document, carried out the “report on the driver’s circumstantial statement” and “report on the result of driving control of drinking alcohol” as if it was genuine with the police officer belonging to the Singu Police Station E box in the Singu Police Station, even though he was aware of the fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver in charge;